Information for "Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed"
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Basic information
| Display title | Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed |
| Default sort key | Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,161 |
| Page ID | 20052 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | HiMark (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 02:23, January 20, 2020 |
| Latest editor | HiMark (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 02:26, January 20, 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 4 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Magic word (1) |
|
| Transcluded templates (2) | Templates used on this page:
|
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Page title: (title)This attribute controls the content of the <title> element. | Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed - Case Brief - Wiki Law School |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | This page contains a case brief for the case Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed. A case brief is a one-page review, commonly made by a law student or attorney, used to learn and understand the legal principle applied. |
Keywords: (keywords)This attribute controls the content of the keywords and article:tag elements. |
|
