Editing Angel v. Murray
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Are the additional payments illegal because they haven't been supported by new [[Contracts/Consideration|consideration]]? | Are the additional payments illegal because they haven't been supported by new [[Contracts/Consideration|consideration]]? | ||
|holding=The contracts are enforceable. | |holding=The contracts are enforceable. | ||
|judgment=Reversed. | |judgment=Reversed. | ||
|reasons=There was no coercion in the formation of the second contract. The city voluntarily agreed to the changes in the agreement. The changes in the conditions that led to the changes in the contract went beyond reasonable expectations at the time of forming the original contract, so it is reasonable that a new contract be created. Because the contract wasn’t fully performed by either party, the contract was changeable. | |reasons=There was no coercion in the formation of the second contract. The city voluntarily agreed to the changes in the agreement. The changes in the conditions that led to the changes in the contract went beyond reasonable expectations at the time of forming the original contract, so it is reasonable that a new contract be created. Because the contract wasn’t fully performed by either party, the contract was changeable. |