Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Relevant Facts''' | '''Relevant Facts''' | ||
Defendant promised to donate to plaintiff college and they relied on her promise. | Defendant promised to donate to plaintiff college and they relied on her promise. | ||
'''Rules''' | '''Rules''' | ||
When a charitable subscription is made, and the charity relies on the promise, a promissory estoppel may result from the assumption of duty to apply the fund as a substitute for consideration. | When a charitable subscription is made, and the charity relies on the promise, a promissory estoppel may result from the assumption of duty to apply the fund as a substitute for consideration. | ||
Revision as of 02:20, January 20, 2020
| Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank | |
| Court | |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | |
Relevant Facts
Defendant promised to donate to plaintiff college and they relied on her promise.
Rules
When a charitable subscription is made, and the charity relies on the promise, a promissory estoppel may result from the assumption of duty to apply the fund as a substitute for consideration.
