Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |subject=Contracts }} '''Relevant Facts'''Defendant promised to donate to plaintiff college and they relied on her promise.'''Rules'''When a charita...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Relevant Facts''' | |||
Defendant promised to donate to plaintiff college and they relied on her promise. | |||
'''Rules''' | |||
When a charitable subscription is made, and the charity relies on the promise, a promissory estoppel may result from the assumption of duty to apply the fund as a substitute for consideration. | |||
Revision as of 02:20, January 20, 2020
| Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank | |
| Court | |
|---|---|
| Citation | |
| Date decided | |
Relevant Facts
Defendant promised to donate to plaintiff college and they relied on her promise.
Rules
When a charitable subscription is made, and the charity relies on the promise, a promissory estoppel may result from the assumption of duty to apply the fund as a substitute for consideration.
