Adams v. Lindsell: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
On September 2nd 1817, Mr. Lindsell mailed a letter to Mr. Adams who was a wool manufacturer. | On September 2nd 1817, Mr. Lindsell mailed a letter to Mr. Adams who was a wool manufacturer. | ||
Defendant (Lindsell) sent, by mail, an offer to sell wool. Due to Defendant's negligence, the offer was received late. | |||
Plaintiff (Adams) immediately accepted, but Defendant (Lindsell) had already sold wool. | |||
|issues=Was Plaintiff's (Adams) purported acceptance actually an acceptance? | |||
|holding=Yes, Plaintiff had accepted. | |||
|reasons=There was a "meeting of the minds" as soon as Plaintiff posted his acceptance in the mail. | |||
|rule=The [https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mailbox_rule mailbox rule] states that acceptance takes effect as soon as a letter stating such is posted. | |||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Cases:Contracts]] | [[Category:Cases:Contracts]] | ||
Revision as of 14:10, July 16, 2023
| Adams v. Lindsell | |
| Court | High Court of Justice, King's Bench Division |
|---|---|
| Citation | 106 Eng.Rep. 250 |
| Date decided | 1818 |
Facts
Before 1800, parties signed a contract face-to-face. By the early 1800s, making & accepting offers by mail was becoming commonplace.
On September 2nd 1817, Mr. Lindsell mailed a letter to Mr. Adams who was a wool manufacturer.
Defendant (Lindsell) sent, by mail, an offer to sell wool. Due to Defendant's negligence, the offer was received late.
Plaintiff (Adams) immediately accepted, but Defendant (Lindsell) had already sold wool.Issues
Was Plaintiff's (Adams) purported acceptance actually an acceptance?
Holding
Yes, Plaintiff had accepted.
Reasons
There was a "meeting of the minds" as soon as Plaintiff posted his acceptance in the mail.
Rule
The mailbox rule states that acceptance takes effect as soon as a letter stating such is posted.
