Adams v. Lindsell: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
m (DeRien moved page Adams v Lindsell to Adams v. Lindsell over redirect: common name)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Case Brief
|court=High Court of Justice, King's Bench Division
|citation=106 Eng.Rep. 250
|date=1818
|subject=Contracts
|facts=Before 1800, parties signed a contract face-to-face. By the early 1800s, making & accepting [[Contracts/Offer|offer]]s by mail was becoming commonplace.
On September 2nd 1817, Mr. Lindsell mailed a letter to Mr. Adams who was a wool manufacturer.
}}
''Adams v. Lindsell'', 106 ER 250 (1818).
''Adams v. Lindsell'', 106 ER 250 (1818).



Revision as of 14:06, July 16, 2023

Adams v. Lindsell
Court High Court of Justice, King's Bench Division
Citation 106 Eng.Rep. 250
Date decided 1818

Facts

Before 1800, parties signed a contract face-to-face. By the early 1800s, making & accepting offers by mail was becoming commonplace.

On September 2nd 1817, Mr. Lindsell mailed a letter to Mr. Adams who was a wool manufacturer.

Adams v. Lindsell, 106 ER 250 (1818).

Facts: Defendant sent, by mail, an offer to sell wool. Due to Defendant's negligence, the offer was received late. Plaintiff immediately accepted, but Defendant had already sold wool.

Issue: Was Plaintiff's purported acceptance actually an acceptance?

Holding: Yes, Plaintiff had accepted.

Reasons: There was a "meeting of the minds" as soon as Plaintiff posted his acceptance in the mail.

Rule: The mailbox rule states that acceptance takes effect as soon as a letter stating such is posted.