 |
Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Zigas v. Superior Court: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|subject=Contracts | |subject=Contracts | ||
|other_subjects=Property | |other_subjects=Property | ||
|facts=* Several landlords who financed an apartment building in San Francisco with a federally insured mortgage = defendants | |facts=*Several landlords who financed an apartment building in San Francisco with a federally insured mortgage = defendants | ||
* U.S. Department of [https://www.hud.gov/ Housing and Urban Development] (HUD) provided financing insurance to these landlords provided that they refrained from charging excessive rents | *U.S. Department of [https://www.hud.gov/ Housing and Urban Development] (HUD) provided financing insurance to these landlords provided that they refrained from charging excessive rents | ||
*Zigas = plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit against the landlords of the apartment building | |||
* | |||
|procedural_history=* Zigas sued the landlords claiming that the landlords had breached their HUD contracts because they were over-charging rents in the apartment community in San Francisco, California | |||
* Zigas & the other tenants stated that they were the 3rd-party [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/intended-beneficiary intended beneficiaries] of the financing contracts of the landlords & HUD | |||
* | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/zigas-v-superior-court | |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/zigas-v-superior-court | ||
Revision as of 16:04, February 4, 2024
| Zigas v. Superior Court | |
| Court | California Court of Appeal |
|---|---|
| Citation | 174 Cal.Rptr. 806, 120 Cal.App.3d 827 |
| Date decided | June 24, 1981 |
Facts
- Several landlords who financed an apartment building in San Francisco with a federally insured mortgage = defendants
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provided financing insurance to these landlords provided that they refrained from charging excessive rents
- Zigas = plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit against the landlords of the apartment building
Procedural History
- Zigas sued the landlords claiming that the landlords had breached their HUD contracts because they were over-charging rents in the apartment community in San Francisco, California
- Zigas & the other tenants stated that they were the 3rd-party intended beneficiaries of the financing contracts of the landlords & HUD
