Young v. United States

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 18:26, March 1, 2024 by DeRien (talk | contribs)

Young v. United States
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation 481 U.S. 787
Date decided May 26, 1987

Facts

  • LOUIS VUITTON ® = manufacturer of leather goods such as luxury handbags = "Vuitton"
  • Klayminc = manufacturer of counterfeit Vuitton bags = "Klayminc"
  • Vuitton & Klayminc reached a settlement that prohibited Klayminc from counter-feiting Vuitton goods
  • The following year, Vuitton hired private investigators to find Vuitton counterfeiters
  • The Vuitton investigators found evidence that Klayminc was stilling producing counterfeit Vuitton goods
  • The Vuitton investigators asked to be appointed by the district court in New York to prosecute a criminal contempt action against Klayminc
  • The New York courted appointed the investigators (who were also attorneys) as special counsels to criminally prosecute Klayminc

Procedural History

  • After their court appointment, the Vuitton investigators file a criminal contempt motion against Klayminc.
  • Klayminc lost in the trial in New York for violating the settlement with Vuitton.

Resources