White Plains v. Cintas: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Case Brief
{{Infobox Case Brief
|court=New York Court of Appeals
|court=New York Court of Appeals
|citation=867 N.E.2d 381
|date=April 26, 2007
|date=April 26, 2007
|subject=Contracts
|subject=Contracts
|facts=* White Plains Coat & Apron Co. = "White Plains" = "White" = a New York company = a linen rental business
* Cintas Corp. = "Cintas" = a national company serving many businesses = a company that rented linens
* Cintas lured the customers of White away by offering lower rates for linen rentals
* Many business customers of White would break their contracts in order to switch over to Cintas
|procedural_history=* White sued Cintas
* White stated that Cintas was liable for tortious interference with contract under New York state law
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://casetext.com/case/white-v-cintas
|link=https://casetext.com/case/white-v-cintas

Revision as of 20:02, February 1, 2024

White Plains v. Cintas
Court New York Court of Appeals
Citation 867 N.E.2d 381
Date decided April 26, 2007

Facts

  • White Plains Coat & Apron Co. = "White Plains" = "White" = a New York company = a linen rental business
  • Cintas Corp. = "Cintas" = a national company serving many businesses = a company that rented linens
  • Cintas lured the customers of White away by offering lower rates for linen rentals
  • Many business customers of White would break their contracts in order to switch over to Cintas

Procedural History

  • White sued Cintas
  • White stated that Cintas was liable for tortious interference with contract under New York state law

Resources