Watts v. Watts

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 20:48, January 31, 2024 by DeRien (talk | contribs)

Watts v. Watts
Court Wisconsin Supreme Court
Citation 405 N.W.2d 305 (1987), 152 Wis.2d 370, 448 N.W.2d 292 (1989)
Date decided September 26, 1989

Facts

  • In the early 1970s, Ms. Evans met Mr. Watts when she was 19 years old.
  • She started co-habiting with her lover based on his assurance that he would provide for her.
  • She abandoned her career plans.
  • The un-married couple lived together.
  • They begot 2 children & raised them over the next 12 years.
  • She took the last name of Watts.
  • They became common-law spouses.
  • The couple identified as spouses on their joint bank accounts, tax returns, home loans, and insurance policies.
  • Initially, the mother took a part-time position at the company of Watts.
  • Later, she started her own company.
  • The couple separated in 1981.
  • The wife moved out.
  • The husband refused to give her any of the couple's property.

Procedural History

  • The wife took the husband to court.
  • The wife sought a division of assets.
  • The woman lost in the trial court for failure to state a claim.

Issues

Can someone in a non-marital, co-habiting relationship claim a share of property accumulated during their romantic relationship?

What are the property rights of un-married co-habitants?

Holding

  • An un-married cohabitant may bring claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, & partition of property to seek a share of property accumulated during the relationship.
  • Decided May 11, 1987
  • Decided September 26, 1989

Judgment

Reversed

Reasons

  • A contract may be implied by the parties' conduct. A legal marriage isn't always necessary.
  • A woman's childbearing or domestic services is sufficient consideration to form an enforceable contract.

Comments

At least 1 U.S. state has ruled against an un-married co-habitant.

Resources