Walker v. Keith: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|subject=Contracts
|subject=Contracts
|other_subjects=Property
|other_subjects=Property
|facts=* Walker = the landlord = plaintiff
|facts=*Walker = the landlord = plaintiff
* Keith = a lease-holder = the defendant
*Keith = a lease-holder = the defendant = tenant
* Walker leased a small lot to Keith for 10 years at $100/month
*Walker leased a small lot to Keith for 10 years at $100/month
*At the end of the 10 years, then tenant (Keith) had the option to renew the lease
*At the end of the 10 years, the monthly rent could jump
*At the end of the 10 years, the 2 parties couldn't agree on the monthly rent amount
*
|procedural_history=* Keith sued Walker to enforce the renewal option.
* The Kentucky trial court ruled in favor of Keith.
* Walker was ordered to rent his lot out to Keith at $125/month.
*
*
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link

Revision as of 23:58, January 27, 2024

Walker v. Keith
Court Kentucky Court of Appeals
Citation 382 S.W.2d 198
Date decided October 16, 1964

Facts

  • Walker = the landlord = plaintiff
  • Keith = a lease-holder = the defendant = tenant
  • Walker leased a small lot to Keith for 10 years at $100/month
  • At the end of the 10 years, then tenant (Keith) had the option to renew the lease
  • At the end of the 10 years, the monthly rent could jump
  • At the end of the 10 years, the 2 parties couldn't agree on the monthly rent amount

Procedural History

  • Keith sued Walker to enforce the renewal option.
  • The Kentucky trial court ruled in favor of Keith.
  • Walker was ordered to rent his lot out to Keith at $125/month.

Resources