Varney v. Ditmars: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=New York Court of Appeals |citation=111 N.E. 822 |date=February 22, 1916 |subject=Contracts |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/varney-v-ditmars |source_type=Video summary |case_text_source=Quimbee }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |link=https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/court-of-appeals/1916/217-n-y-223-111-n-e-822-1916.html |case_text_source=Justia }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text...")
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|date=February 22, 1916
|date=February 22, 1916
|subject=Contracts
|subject=Contracts
|facts=* Ditmars = boss of an architectural firm
* Varney = an employee
* In October 1910, Ditmars hired Varney with an initial salary of $35/week
* Shortly afterward, Varney wanted to accept a position with a different company; however, Ditmars persuaded Varney to stay put
*
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/varney-v-ditmars
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/varney-v-ditmars

Revision as of 20:15, January 20, 2024

Varney v. Ditmars
Court New York Court of Appeals
Citation 111 N.E. 822
Date decided February 22, 1916

Facts

  • Ditmars = boss of an architectural firm
  • Varney = an employee
  • In October 1910, Ditmars hired Varney with an initial salary of $35/week
  • Shortly afterward, Varney wanted to accept a position with a different company; however, Ditmars persuaded Varney to stay put

Resources