Nollan v. California: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Nollan wanted to build a bigger house. So, he applied for a permit from the California Coastal Commission (CCC; "California"). | *Nollan wanted to build a bigger house. So, he applied for a permit from the California Coastal Commission (CCC; "California"). | ||
*California granted the permit to build a larger house with a proviso that Nollan convey an '''easement''' allowing the public to cross the beach on his land | *California granted the permit to build a larger house with a proviso that Nollan convey an '''easement''' allowing the public to cross the beach on his land | ||
*California found the proposed house of Nollan would block the public's view of the ocean | |||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
Revision as of 23:06, April 15, 2024
| Nollan v. California | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | 483 U.S. 825 |
| Date decided | June 26, 1987 |
Facts
- Nollan owned a beach-front property between 2 public beaches in Ventura County, California.
- Nollan wanted to build a bigger house. So, he applied for a permit from the California Coastal Commission (CCC; "California").
- California granted the permit to build a larger house with a proviso that Nollan convey an easement allowing the public to cross the beach on his land
- California found the proposed house of Nollan would block the public's view of the ocean
Comments
Resources
