Nollan v. California: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=June 26, 1987 | |date=June 26, 1987 | ||
|subject=Property | |subject=Property | ||
|facts=* Nollan owned a beach-front property between 2 public beaches in Ventura County, California. | |facts=*Nollan owned a beach-front property between 2 public beaches in Ventura County, California. | ||
* Nollan wanted to build a bigger house. So, he applied for a permit from the California Coastal Commission (CCC). | *Nollan wanted to build a bigger house. So, he applied for a permit from the California Coastal Commission (CCC; "California"). | ||
*California granted the permit to build a larger house with a proviso that Nollan convey an '''easement''' allowing the public to cross the beach on his land | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | * | ||
|comments=[[Property_Merrill/Outline#XVI._EXACTIONS]] | |comments=[[Property_Merrill/Outline#XVI._EXACTIONS]] | ||
Revision as of 23:04, April 15, 2024
| Nollan v. California | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United States |
|---|---|
| Citation | 483 U.S. 825 |
| Date decided | June 26, 1987 |
Facts
- Nollan owned a beach-front property between 2 public beaches in Ventura County, California.
- Nollan wanted to build a bigger house. So, he applied for a permit from the California Coastal Commission (CCC; "California").
- California granted the permit to build a larger house with a proviso that Nollan convey an easement allowing the public to cross the beach on his land
Comments
Resources
