Editing Nollan v. California

{{Infobox Case Brief
|court=Supreme Court of the United States
|citation=483 U.S. 825
|date=June 26, 1987
|subject=Property
|facts=*Nollan owned a beach-front property between 2 public beaches in Ventura County, California.
*Nollan wanted to build a bigger house. So, he applied for a permit from the California Coastal Commission (CCC; "California").
*California granted the permit to build a larger house with a proviso that Nollan convey an '''easement''' allowing the public to cross the beach on his land
*California found the proposed house of Nollan would block the public's view of the ocean
*
*
*
|procedural_history=Nollan challenged the conditional permit in state court
|arguments=Nollan argued that the condition violates the [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/taking Takings Clause] in the 5th Amendment to the [[Constitution of the United States|U.S. Constitution]].
|holding=No; a state agency can't impose a condition on the approval of a private-property owner's land-use permit unless there's an essential nexus between the condition & the legitimate state interest at issue.
|judgment=Reversed
|reasons=Antonin Scalia: if the state told Nollan to convey an easement without compensation, then that would be an un-constitutional taking.
|comments=[[Property_Merrill/Outline#XVI._EXACTIONS]]
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/nollan-v-california-coastal-commission
|source_type=Video summary
|case_text_source=Quimbee
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1986/86-133
|case_text_source=Oyez
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/483/825
|case_text_source=Cornell Law School
}}
|case_videos={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Video
|service=YouTube
|id=BcPEopoBS3k
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Video
|service=YouTube
|id=fnEiHd2I_lQ
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Video
|service=YouTube
|id=08gBDCrfP7U
}}
}}
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *
 *
-|procedural_history=* Nollan challenged the conditional permit in state court
+|procedural_history=Nollan challenged the conditional permit in state court
-* Nollan won in the trial court, but he lost in the appellate court
-|issues=Can a state agency impose a condition on the approval of a private-property owner's land-use permit if there isn't an essential nexus between the condition & a legitimate state interest?
 |arguments=Nollan argued that the condition violates the [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/taking Takings Clause] in the 5th Amendment to the [[Constitution of the United States|U.S. Constitution]].
 |holding=No; a state agency can't impose a condition on the approval of a private-property owner's land-use permit unless there's an essential nexus between the condition & the legitimate state interest at issue.