Nixon v. Fitzgerald: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "''Nixon v. Fitzgerald'', 457 U.S. 731 (1982). '''Facts''': A. Ernest Fitzgerald filed a law suit against government officials claiming that he lost his position as a contract...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Facts''': A. Ernest Fitzgerald filed a law suit against government officials claiming that he lost his position as a contractor with the United States Air Force because of testimony made before Congress in the 1970s. Among the people listed in the law suit was former President Richard Nixon.
'''Facts''': A. Ernest Fitzgerald filed a law suit against government officials claiming that he lost his position as a contractor with the United States Air Force because of testimony made before Congress in the 1970s. Among the people listed in the law suit was former President Richard Nixon.


'''Issue''': Is the President entitled to absolute immunity from liability for civil damages based on his official acts?
'''Issue''': Is the President entitled to <span style="background:lime">absolute immunity</span> from liability for civil damages based on his official acts?


'''Holding''': Yes.
'''Holding''': Yes.

Latest revision as of 17:23, December 1, 2022

Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982).

Facts: A. Ernest Fitzgerald filed a law suit against government officials claiming that he lost his position as a contractor with the United States Air Force because of testimony made before Congress in the 1970s. Among the people listed in the law suit was former President Richard Nixon.

Issue: Is the President entitled to absolute immunity from liability for civil damages based on his official acts?

Holding: Yes.

Notes: However, the President is not immune from criminal charges stemming from official (or unofficial) acts while in office.