Newman v. Bost: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/newman-v-bost |citation=29 S.E. 848, 122 N.C. 524 |date=April 1, 1898 |subject=Property |rule=''Donatio Causa Mortis'' |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |link=https://casetext.com/case/newman-v-bost |case_text_source=CaseText }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/newman-v-bost |source_type=Video summary |case_text_source=Quimbee }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Tex...")
 
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Case Brief
{{Infobox Case Brief
|court=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/newman-v-bost
|court=North Carolina Supreme Court
|citation=29 S.E. 848, 122 N.C. 524
|citation=29 S.E. 848, 122 N.C. 524
|date=April 1, 1898
|date=April 1, 1898
|subject=Property
|subject=Property
|rule=''Donatio Causa Mortis''
|facts=*Mr. Van Pelt = an outright house owner; a wealthy man in North Carolina in the late 1800s whose wife was deceased; he didn't have any children
*Mrs. Newman = the housekeeper of Mr. Pelt
*Pelt gave Newman a set of keys & announced his desire to bequeath everything in his house to her
*1 of the keys was to a bureau in his house which contained a $3,000 life insurance policy
*In 1896, Van Pelt died intestate & without children in Statesville, North Carolina
*Upon Van Pelt's death, a relative of Van Pelt named Mr. Bost emerged claiming to be the administer of Van Pelt's house & other possessions
*Bost cashed in on all the belongings in the house
*
*
|procedural_history=* Newman sued Bost in the Superior Court in North Carolina
* Newman won in the trial court
|issues=By handing over a set of keys, can a person effectively deliver a gift of all personal property located in the person's home?
|holding=No; by handing over a set of keys only constructively delivers gifts that aren't present in the home or are incapable of physical delivery.
|judgment=Reversed
|reasons=Justice Furches: Most items in the house weren't gifted to Newman by constructive delivery when Van Pelt handed her the keys to the home
|rule=''Donatio [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/gifts-causa-mortis Causa Mortis]''
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://casetext.com/case/newman-v-bost
|link=https://casetext.com/case/newman-v-bost

Latest revision as of 13:19, April 11, 2024

Newman v. Bost
Court North Carolina Supreme Court
Citation 29 S.E. 848, 122 N.C. 524
Date decided April 1, 1898

Facts

  • Mr. Van Pelt = an outright house owner; a wealthy man in North Carolina in the late 1800s whose wife was deceased; he didn't have any children
  • Mrs. Newman = the housekeeper of Mr. Pelt
  • Pelt gave Newman a set of keys & announced his desire to bequeath everything in his house to her
  • 1 of the keys was to a bureau in his house which contained a $3,000 life insurance policy
  • In 1896, Van Pelt died intestate & without children in Statesville, North Carolina
  • Upon Van Pelt's death, a relative of Van Pelt named Mr. Bost emerged claiming to be the administer of Van Pelt's house & other possessions
  • Bost cashed in on all the belongings in the house

Procedural History

  • Newman sued Bost in the Superior Court in North Carolina
  • Newman won in the trial court

Issues

By handing over a set of keys, can a person effectively deliver a gift of all personal property located in the person's home?

Holding

No; by handing over a set of keys only constructively delivers gifts that aren't present in the home or are incapable of physical delivery.

Judgment

Reversed

Reasons

Justice Furches: Most items in the house weren't gifted to Newman by constructive delivery when Van Pelt handed her the keys to the home

Rule

Donatio Causa Mortis

Resources