Minneapolis v. Columbus: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
(Created page with "{{Infobox Case Brief |court=Supreme Court of the United States |date=November 29, 1886 |subject=Contracts |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/minneapolis-amp-st-louis-railway-co-v-columbus-rolling-mill-co |source_type=Video summary |case_text_source=Quimbee }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link |link=https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/119/149 |case_text_source=Cornell Law School }}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case T...")
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|date=November 29, 1886
|date=November 29, 1886
|subject=Contracts
|subject=Contracts
|facts=* Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. = "Minneapolis" = plaintiff = a train company based in Minnesota = a company needing iron for its railways
* Columbus Rolling-Mill Co.  = "Columbus" = defendant = an iron manufacturer
*
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/minneapolis-amp-st-louis-railway-co-v-columbus-rolling-mill-co
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/minneapolis-amp-st-louis-railway-co-v-columbus-rolling-mill-co

Revision as of 19:16, December 10, 2023

Minneapolis v. Columbus
Court Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
Date decided November 29, 1886

Facts

  • Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. = "Minneapolis" = plaintiff = a train company based in Minnesota = a company needing iron for its railways
  • Columbus Rolling-Mill Co. = "Columbus" = defendant = an iron manufacturer

Resources