Information for "MPEP 2121"
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
| Display title | MPEP 2121 |
| Default sort key | MPEP 2121 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 10,763 |
| Page ID | 1776 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
| Page creator | Lost Student (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 23:02, May 28, 2007 |
| Latest editor | Lost Student (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 23:00, May 31, 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (2) | Templates used on this page:
|
| Page transcluded on (1) | Template used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | When the reference relied on expressly anticipates
or makes obvious all of the elements of the claimed
invention, the reference is presumed to be operable.
Once such a reference is found, the burden is on applicant
to provide facts rebutting the presumption of
operability. In re Sasse, 629 F.2d 675, 207 USPQ 107
(CCPA 1980). See also MPEP § 716.07. |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO
