Leonard v. Pepsi: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
m (Redirected page to Leonard v. Pepsico)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Case Brief
|court=United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
|date=August 5, 1999
|subject=Contracts/Outline
|case_treatment=No
|facts=[https://www.pepsico.com/ Pepsi] ran a promotion in the 1990s to encourage consumers to collect "Pepsi points." One of the Pepsi ads shows a boy exchanging 7,000,000 Pepsi points for a [https://www.military.com/equipment/av-8b-harrier-ii Harrier military jet].
Leonard really wanted the Harrier jet. He figured that 7,000,000 Pepsi points would require him to spend $700,000. At the time, disregarding the civilian restrictions from buying a military jet, the cost of the said Harrier jet was $23,000,0000. Thus, it seemed to Leonard like a discount of over $22 million dollars from Pepsi if the ad had been serious.
When Leonard ordered the Harrier Jet, Pepsi officials replied that the advertisement was intended to be humorous and attention-grabbing.
|procedural_history=Pepsi sued Leonard in the Southern District of NY seeking declaratory judgment that the Pepsi didn't owe Leonard the jet.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/88/116/2579076/
|case_text_source=Justia
}}{{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/leonard-v-pepsico
|case_text_source=Quimbee video summary
}}
}}
#REDIRECT [[Leonard v. Pepsico]]
#REDIRECT [[Leonard v. Pepsico]]

Latest revision as of 01:38, June 16, 2023

Redirect to: