Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co.

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
Revision as of 13:49, January 27, 2020 by Lost Student (talk | contribs)

Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co.
Court
Citation 769 F.2d 1284 (7th Cir. 1985)
Date decided

Facts: Plaintiff agreed to build a new bagging system for Defendant under a contract with a liquidated damages clause. Defendant breached, and Plaintiff wanted damages according to the liquidated damages clause.

Holding: Held for Defendant.

Reasons: Although Plaintiff is entitled to damages, the liquidated damages clause is unreasonable in that it is disproportionate to the actual loss.

Rule: Damages = contract price - amount saved by non-shipment.