Keydata v. United States: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
*
*
*
*
|issues=What law should apply to a government lease?
|procedural_history=* Keydata sued NASA to collect the $39,000 payment (for the AC equipment) as Wyman's assignee
* Both parties moved for summary judgment
*
|issues=In a lease involving the U.S. government, must the landlord deliver actual possession of the leased premises at the beginning of the lease term?
 
 
What law should apply to a government lease?
|arguments=* Keydata argued that Wyman only had the right to deliver possession to NASA  on January 1st 1969, but no duty to deliver actual possession to NASA.
* Keydata argued that Wyman had fulfilled its obligation as landlord.
* Keydata argued that NASA had illegally rescinded the lease.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/keydata-corporation-v-united-states
|link=https://www.quimbee.com/cases/keydata-corporation-v-united-states

Revision as of 15:03, March 30, 2024

Keydata v. United States
Court United States Court of Claims
Citation 504 F.2d 1115
Date decided October 23, 1974

Facts

  • Keydata Corporation = "Keydata" = 1st tenant
  • NASA = the National Aeronautics and Space Administration = 2nd tenants
  • Wyman Street Trust = "Wyman" = commercial building proprietor
  • Keydata & NASA leased a space at a building owned by Wyman in Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • NASA needed more space in the leased building
  • Keydata was looking to move out of the leased building
  • NASA agreed to rent Keydata's computer room in the building
  • The contract between the 2 tenants (Keydata & NASA) was set forth in a lease contract executed by the commercial landlord (Wyman)
  • Keydata would lease the space to NASA starting on January 1st 1969
  • NASA agreed to pay Wyman $39,000 for air-conditioning equipment that Keydata had installed in the computer room
  • Wyman would then turn around & hand over the 39,000 to Keydata for the AC equipment
  • However, Keydata refused to vacate the computer room by January 1st 1969
  • The next day, NASA canceled the lease contract because Keydata hadn't vacated
  • Also, NASA didn't pay Wyman the $39,000 for the AC equipment

Procedural History

  • Keydata sued NASA to collect the $39,000 payment (for the AC equipment) as Wyman's assignee
  • Both parties moved for summary judgment

Issues

In a lease involving the U.S. government, must the landlord deliver actual possession of the leased premises at the beginning of the lease term?


What law should apply to a government lease?

Arguments

  • Keydata argued that Wyman only had the right to deliver possession to NASA on January 1st 1969, but no duty to deliver actual possession to NASA.
  • Keydata argued that Wyman had fulfilled its obligation as landlord.
  • Keydata argued that NASA had illegally rescinded the lease.

Resources