In re Greene: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


In total, Trudel wanted $375,700 from Greene.
In total, Trudel wanted $375,700 from Greene.
|issues=Is $1 sufficient consideration to support a married man's promise to pay his ex-lover more than $375,000 [in the 1930 dollars]?
 
 
Greene lost in the bankruptcy court.
|issues=Is a payment of $1 paid by Greene to Trudel at the time of the signing of the contract & a general statement of value exchanged between parties sufficient consideration to support a promise to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars (100,000s)?
 
 
Is $1 sufficient consideration to support a married man's promise to pay his ex-lover more than $375,000 [in the 1930 dollars]?
|arguments=Greene's bankruptcy trustee objected to the woman's claims & filed an appeal.
|holding=No. Nominal payments & vague statements of consideration are insufficient to support a legally enforceable contract between parties.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/in-re-greene-63279078
|link=https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/in-re-greene-63279078

Revision as of 02:51, November 11, 2023

In re Greene
Court Southern District of New York
Citation 45 F.2d 428
Date decided December 6, 1930

Facts

  • Mr. Greene = "Greene" = defendant = a married man
  • the claimant = plaintiff = Ms. Trudel = a woman who has an extra-marital affair with Greene
  • In the course of the romantic extra-marital affair in the 1920s, Greene routinely gave the woman substantial amounts of money including $70,000 for the woman to purchase a house in Long Island, New York.
  • Ms. Trudel was fully aware of Greene's marriage but continued with the affair.
  • Greene & Ms. Trudel ended their affair in April 1926 by signing an agreement which was sealed.
  • In accordance with the aforesaid agreement, Greene promised to pay Ms. Trudel $1,000/month during their joint lives. Moreover, Greene promised to pay more sums under additional provisions.
  • Still more, Greene promised to pay the woman's monthly lease for 4 more years (1926 - 1930).
  • In exchange, the woman promised to release Greene from all claims against him.
April 1926
Greene & Trudel contract
Greene's final payment to Trudel
August 1928
&nbsp late 1928;
Greene becomes bankrupt
Trudel files claim in the bankruptcy hearing
late 1928




Procedural History

Ms. Trudel demanded

  • $250,000 in payment,
  • $99,200 for failing to keep a life insurance policy with the woman as the beneficiary, &
  • $26,500 for rent

In total, Trudel wanted $375,700 from Greene.


Greene lost in the bankruptcy court.

Issues

Is a payment of $1 paid by Greene to Trudel at the time of the signing of the contract & a general statement of value exchanged between parties sufficient consideration to support a promise to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars (100,000s)?


Is $1 sufficient consideration to support a married man's promise to pay his ex-lover more than $375,000 [in the 1930 dollars]?

Arguments

Greene's bankruptcy trustee objected to the woman's claims & filed an appeal.

Holding

No. Nominal payments & vague statements of consideration are insufficient to support a legally enforceable contract between parties.

Resources