Brown v. Voss: Difference between revisions

From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
*
*
*
*
|procedural_history=* Brown sued Voss over the easement between parcels B & A.
|procedural_history=*Brown sued Voss over the easement between parcels B & A.
* Voss lost in the trial court.
*Voss lost in the trial court.
*Voss won in the court of appeals in the state of Washington.
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link
|link=https://law.justia.com/cases/washington/supreme-court/1986/51283-3-1.html
|link=https://law.justia.com/cases/washington/supreme-court/1986/51283-3-1.html

Revision as of 21:03, March 3, 2024

Brown v. Voss
Court Washington Supreme Court
Citation 715 P.2d 514
Date decided March 6, 1986

Facts

  • 3 parcels of land were arranged south to north:
  1. parcel C = driveway easement
  2. parcel B = Brown's property = dominant estate
  3. parcel A = Voss's property = servient estate

Thus, A had to pass through parcel B in order to reach the driveway easement.

  • Later, parcel C = driveway's easement = purchase by Brown
  • Brown 1st met Voss when Brown complained about a trespass by Voss's nephew
  • Subsequently, Brown built a house that straddled parcels B & C (both of which Brown owned by this time)
  • Brown & Voss had a fist-fight.

Procedural History

  • Brown sued Voss over the easement between parcels B & A.
  • Voss lost in the trial court.
  • Voss won in the court of appeals in the state of Washington.

Resources