Wiki Law School will soon be moving! Please update your bookmarks. Our future address is www.wikilawschool.org |
Boomer v. Atlantic Cement: Difference between revisions
From wikilawschool.net. Wiki Law School does not provide legal advice. For educational purposes only.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
|procedural_history=* Boomer sued Atlantic for nuisance in New York state court. | |procedural_history=*Boomer sued Atlantic for nuisance in New York state court. | ||
* The trial court found that the nuisance of the Atlantic plant was a material issue; however, the court decided to weigh in the economic impact of Atlantic job losses. | *The trial court found that the nuisance of the Atlantic plant was a material issue; however, the court decided to weigh in the economic impact of Atlantic job losses. | ||
* Boomer lost in the trial court. | *Boomer lost in the trial court. | ||
* The trial court ruled that the economic harm outweighed the nuisance. | *The trial court ruled that the economic harm outweighed the nuisance. At the same time, the trial court awarded [[damages]] to Boomer. | ||
*The reviewing court affirmed the loss of Boomer. | |||
* | * | ||
|issues=What is the appropriate remedy for an on-going nuisance if an injunction to stop the nuisance would cause more economic harm than the nuisance itself? | |||
|holding=The appropriate remedy is an injunction that would be lifted upon the payment of [https://www.quimbee.com/keyterms/permanent-damages permanent damages]. | |||
|case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | |case_text_links={{Infobox Case Brief/Case Text Link | ||
|link=https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/court-of-appeals/1970/26-n-y-2d-219-309-n-y-s-2d-312-257-n-e-2d-870.html | |link=https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/court-of-appeals/1970/26-n-y-2d-219-309-n-y-s-2d-312-257-n-e-2d-870.html |
Revision as of 00:03, March 3, 2024
Boomer v. Atlantic Cement | |
Court | New York Court of Appeals |
---|---|
Citation | 26 N.Y.2d 219, 309 N.Y.S.2d 312, 257 N.E.2d 870 |
Date decided | March 4, 1970 |
Facts
- Atlantic Cement Co. = "Atlantic" = a company that operated a plant near Albany, New York
- Atlantic employed over 300 people & invested over $45,000,000 in the aforesaid plant
- Atlantic plant emitted large plumes of smoke & dust
- Mr. Boomer = "Boomer" = a neighbor of the Atlantic plant and other residents = plaintiffs
Procedural History
- Boomer sued Atlantic for nuisance in New York state court.
- The trial court found that the nuisance of the Atlantic plant was a material issue; however, the court decided to weigh in the economic impact of Atlantic job losses.
- Boomer lost in the trial court.
- The trial court ruled that the economic harm outweighed the nuisance. At the same time, the trial court awarded damages to Boomer.
- The reviewing court affirmed the loss of Boomer.
Issues
What is the appropriate remedy for an on-going nuisance if an injunction to stop the nuisance would cause more economic harm than the nuisance itself?
Holding
The appropriate remedy is an injunction that would be lifted upon the payment of permanent damages.